Life and Times of Leading Cardiologists: Deepak Bhatt
This site is intended for healthcare professionals

COMMENTARY

Life and Times of Leading Cardiologists: Deepak Bhatt

E. Magnus Ohman, MD; Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, MPH

Disclosures

May 10, 2019

1

This transcript has been edited for clarity.

E. Magnus Ohman, MD: Hello. I am Magnus Ohman, and I want to welcome you to another edition of Life and Times of Leading Cardiologists. We are very fortunate to have with us my old friend, Deepak Bhatt, who is professor of medicine at Harvard and head of the interventional program at Brigham.

You and I got together very early; I want to say in the '90s. We both learned a lot from working with Eric Topol and Rob Califf. We used to get together and have lunches at meetings, so this is almost like one of those lunches again.

Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, MPH: It brought back a lot of good memories when we were trying to figure out exactly when and where we met. Those were really great meetings. We got to know a lot of folks at Duke and Cleveland Clinic really well.

Ohman: Rob and Eric trained a lot of good people. Both of us trained with them, so we should be happy. Let's talk a little bit about your life. Where did you grow up, Deepak?

A Father's Academic Path

Bhatt: I consider you a good friend, and we have known each other really well for a long time, but you are right; we have never really talked about those sorts of things. I was born in India, but when I was really young, my family moved to the United States. My father came over, I think, on one of the old Ford Foundation Grants in the '60s to get his PhD in linguistics at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.

Ohman: This is why you are such a good writer. That is an amazing coincidence.

Bhatt: In fact, when I was older and he had moved to Boston University (BU), he would have me do copyediting for him. Maybe that did spark my love of writing. At any rate, we were in Wisconsin for a while and my parents were planning to go back to India once he got his PhD. There were not a lot of roles for academic linguists with a PhD in India, so he stayed in the United States. We traveled around the Midwest following his career. He was on the faculty at Michigan State, University of Minnesota–St. Paul, and the liberal arts College of Wooster in Wooster, Ohio.

Ohman: My daughter applied there.

Bhatt: Yes, it's a lovely town and a great liberal arts college. He was recruited to BU, where he spent several years on the faculty teaching linguistics and other sorts of things.

Ohman: Was this in English or Hindu?

Bhatt: Linguistics is the study of language, so it transcends any specific language. Back then I suppose it was more of a liberal arts–based field. It has evolved now, in some cases to more of a technical field in terms of computational linguistics, natural language processing, and artificial intelligence.

Family Life

Ohman: Where in India did the family come from?

Bhatt: My parents lived all over in India. I was born in a really small village called Udupi, but it has grown since then, like a lot of places. You would not have heard of it, although it is famous for its vegetarian cuisine. It is very well known among people who like Indian food.

Ohman: Did you come from a large family? Any brothers or sisters?

Bhatt: No. My family is pretty small; it's just my parents, my sister, and me. The families my parents came from were larger. My mother had two siblings. One had died, unfortunately, at a young age. My father came from a huge family. He had 13 siblings, but he too had a sibling who died. He lived in a small village and came from a rather poor background. As you might imagine, coming from a village and a large family like that, there was not a lot of money. There was a lot of love, but not a lot of money.

Ohman: The Bhatt family was basically half the village, from what you described. Did your mother work during this process?

Bhatt: Absolutely. She was a science teacher in India and she really liked that. I am not sure she ever loved linguistics. My parents never pressured me to go into anything, but the one thing my mother would always tell me is, "Do not go into linguistics—there is no money and you need to move around a lot." Other than that, they did not really care what I did. She did not get to teach here because I think the barrier of entry was too high. She would have needed to get all sorts of new certificates and everything. She stayed at home when we were young, but later on she worked in downtown Boston at Jordan Marsh (what is now Macy's).

Again, when I was really young, we moved around a lot. For some people, especially at a young age, moving can be traumatic. As a parent I always think about whether it's a good idea or not to move, because of the kids. I got used to moving around and getting plopped in a new city and having to make new friends quite a bit, so it never bothered me. I don't think it has done any psychological damage, but you can be the judge of that.

Ohman: No, in fact it explains a lot about your ability to communicate with such a broad array of people. It's wonderful to hear this. You went to high school in Boston?

Bhatt: Yes, I am a product of the Boston public school system. I went to a couple of public schools before that, but then I went to Boston Latin, the oldest high school in the country. I graduated from there and was valedictorian.

Ohman: Did you have a valedictory speech?

Bhatt: I did. It was the typical type of valedictory speech, mostly just about young people and making sure they use their talent to do something useful in the world, with a lot of optimism and encouragement to make the world a better place. That idealistic stuff.

Deciding on Medicine

Ohman: When did you decide on science and medicine? Obviously, your mother was an influence.

Bhatt: A couple of different things influenced me. Sometime in the '70s, when I was age 9, I had really bad stomach pains. My parents took me to Kennedy Children's Hospital in Boston, which has since gone bankrupt and no longer exists. The intern said it was probably a gastroenteritis and discharged me. She said to my mother, "Oh, it's nothing. He's just a kid; he's complaining." This was in the days when the attending physician was on premises but nowhere in sight. Only the intern saw me.

The surgeon drove in through a blizzard, did an emergency appendectomy on me, and saved my life.

With her background in the life sciences and a lot of common sense, my mother said, "He is not a complainer; I am really worried that it is something." But the doctor said to go home. My parents took me home, but it turned out to be appendicitis. The appendix ruptured and I got septic, with a really high temperature—actually documented at 108˚, if you can believe that. It looked pretty bad. A surgeon drove in through a blizzard, did an emergency appendectomy on me, and saved my life. I was in the hospital for a long time, but obviously I survived. I could have died.

Ohman: Surgical healthcare was pretty good in the '70s. What was your reaction as a very sick 9-year-old patient in the surgical ward?

Bhatt: First of all, my parents were not at all litigious. If they were, that was going to be a slam-dunk case, for a number of reasons. They were just thankful to the doctors and nurses and God that I was alive. For some people, that would have been a negative experience; but for myself, I loved the hospital. I really liked the doctors and nurses, and they were friendly and nice to me. They were doing good stuff with the other sick kids there too.

That one experience did not necessarily crystalize things. I liked science and writing—I enjoyed many things. I did not want to go too far from home for college. When deciding between Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), I received a better financial aid package from MIT so I went there.

Ohman: I see MIT more as a technical school. Besides the financial aid package, there must have been something else you liked about MIT.

Bhatt: I thought it was just going to be a terrific place to go and would be a great platform to do other things. I think my advisor there, Dr Robert Weinberg, had a big effect on me. He had discovered the first oncogene and was a really brilliant individual. I was thinking of being a cancer researcher. I thought, "Why not cure cancer?" It is a nice, lofty goal for a young person, but I was a bit naïve, not fully understanding at the time how complex cancer is.

I still remember a conversation vividly, when I was asking what motivated him to go into science and so forth. He said it was the love of science. He loved the beauty of science and its elegance. He said if what he was doing never translated into anything, he would not be personally disappointed. That is easy to say after you discover the first oncogene, because obviously he has made a huge contribution. But he was sincere in saying it was not necessarily a motivation to do something that would be immediately clinically applicable.

  • 1

Comments

3090D553-9492-4563-8681-AD288FA52ACE
Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.

processing....